Friday, May 4, 2018

FROM THE OUTDOOR WIRE ARTICLE PUBLISHED ON MAY 4th 2018, TELLS IT ALL.



FEATURE
NRA Underway/New Rumors, New Products
Today, the 147th edition of the National Rifle Association’s Annual Meetings & Exhibits opens its doors to Dallas attendees. And as the crowds file in, the conversations are already pointing toward the simple fact that we really have become a nation of “skimmers” not full-text readers.
“Skimming” is the best explanation of the furor following Vista Outdoors’ (NYSE:VSTO) release of strategic planning and evaluation information earlier this week. 
In that information, Vista explained their strategic decision to focus on core strengths. That process (underway for more than a year, not in response to recent occurrences) includes evaluations as to which of the myriad of products and companies best represented Vista’s best-opportunities to grow and prosper.
That evaluative process included a hard look at the areas where two situations exist: 1) the products were outside core competencies or , 2) growth would require significant capital investment. 
The first cut evaluation (core competencies) meant that the Sports Protection division, which includes Bell, Giro and Blackburn helmets and the Jimmy Styks paddle boards were likely candidates for divestiture.
The second-- significant capital investment-- meant that Savage and Stevens gun companies might be sale candidates. 
Cue the online firestorm. 
Vista was immediately set upon by “digital experts” who see the suggestion of a course of action as the pronouncement that both Savage and Stevens gun companies were goners.
Having spoken with Vista officials, here’s the short version of that position: it is wrong.
Savage and Stevens are still in business, in production, and operating as normal. Vista said it was EXPLORING strategic alternatives, not shutting the companies down, putting them on the block, or -as many have erroneously reported- exiting the firearms business. 
Savage and Stevens are, we’re assured, very viable brands. 
But that’s not the issue. Vista is concerned with the overall health of the company.
Making Savage and/or Stevens into full-line companies  would call for significant capital expenditure - with no guarantee their products would resonate with consumers. 
That’s the equivalent of a corporate crap shoot. Instead, you’re well-advised to consider what they’d be worth to others -in their present, working, form.
After all, Savage makes high quality long guns. Stevens is also a well-regarded brand.  
Dispassionate business observation makes it pretty obvious that either company could succeed as stand-alone businesses. They’re solid, niche companies.  And niche products seldom flourish in conglomerates.
Since 2017, Vista’s been in the midst of a deleveraging program.
Deleveraging a corporation is no akin to lowering your debt burden as an individual. You look at the things that are making -or costing- you money, determine the likelihood of improving them, and try to cut unnecessary spending.
It’s more complicated as a business, but the concept’s the same.
Vista tells me, theirs is an “unwavering commitment to the Second Amendment” - and their commitment is reflected in their focus on their ammunition and accessories businesses. 
Just thought you’d like to hear their side of the story rather than the rants and declarations of others. 
Yesterday afternoon, SIG SAUER rolled out a new offering from their “Electro-Optics” division. I’ve kidded their officials for using that categorization for “gunsights and rangefinders.”
Now I “get” why they’ve characterized them that way. 
Their new BDX system (details in today’s news section) integrates a riflescope, rangefinder and phone app into a connected system designed specifically for hunting.
I say specifically designed for hunting because of a core functionality designed to promote ethical hunting- not just enabling shooters to simply increase the ranges they feel capable of shooting. There is a difference. Target shooting isn’t the same thing as hunting.

SIG SAUER’s New BDX system enables  longer shots while simultaneously setting reasonable expectations from your rifle. Jim Shepherd/OWDN photo.


The new BDX (Ballistic Data Exchange) rangefinders and riflescopes exchange information with each other wirelessly (bluetooth) after being linked by the SIG BDX smartphone app. Based on the ballistic profile you create in the app, the rangefinder and riflescope communicate and calculate the firing solution to your target. Then you put the illuminated dot on your target and fire.
But not so fast...the system also includes a “KinETHIC” step. 
What that marketology-rich word (KinETHIC) means is the system determines if you have sufficient kinetic energy to take and ethical shot at your game. There’s a calculable threshold below which the kinetic energy  transferred wouldn’t be sufficient to yield an ethical kill shot.
As Electro-Optics manager Andy York says, “Ethics in hunting are a contract we make with ourselves based on standards sportsmen adhere to as a group- what we feel good about personally, and respect for the game and hunting traditions.”
The KinETHIC system asks that the hunter make an educated and ethical decision beforehand by setting guidelines beyond the simple “reach out and touch” solution of most systems. 
As York says, “knowing your maximum effective hunting range is more than knowing just what you can hit.”
Looking forward to getting some time on the new system-because this additional wrinkle in the system brings the realities of hitting something versus humanely harvesting game together in one package.
As always, we’ll keep you posted.
--Jim Shepherd

No comments:

Post a Comment